Previously, it could take the long way around. This recomputes the
profile goal with the shortest error, thus taking the shortest path.
Also removed the setpoint clamping from PIDController::SetSetpoint()
because it's unnecessary to make PIDController behave correctly for
a modular arithmetic input, and it breaks the setpoint calculation in
ProfiledPIDController otherwise.
Fixes#2277.
- new CommandScheduler
- kinematics and odometry classes
- new PIDController
- ProfiledPIDController
- TrapezoidProfile (reported in Constraints class)
Also update instances.txt to match latest NI version.
One side effect is that a couple of classes are no longer constexpr.
This removes the name and subsystem from individual objects, and instead
puts this data into a new singleton class, SendableRegistry. Much of
LiveWindow has been refactored into SendableRegistry.
In C++, a new CRTP helper class, SendableHelper, has been added to provide
move and destruction functionality.
Shims for GetName, SetName, GetSubsystem, and SetSubsystem have been added
to Command and Subsystem (both old and new), and also to SendableHelper to
prevent code breakage.
This deprecates SendableBase in preparation for future removal.
If users are attempting to use the output range to limit the controller
action, they should use ProfiledPIDController instead. If they actually
intended to clamp the output, they should use std::clamp().
It breaks the unit system badly; the tolerance member variable has
different units depending on percent vs absolute. Absolute tolerance is
a lot more natural than percent tolerance anyway.
Add unit-taking overloads to the following classes:
- IterativeRobotBase
- LinearFilter
- Notifier
- TimedRobot
- Timer (HasPeriodPassed only)
- frc2::PIDController
The corresponding non-units-taking functions have been deprecated.
The return value of TimedRobot::GetPeriod() was updated.
This is a breaking change, users should use to<double> to get the value in seconds.
Other return values, e.g. Timer::Get(), have NOT been updated due to much wider use.
Teams that wish to use it asynchronously may still do so - they simply need to handle the thread safety themselves (it is not that difficult, and can be done more cleanly in the calling code anyway).
std::scoped_lock was introduced in C++17 and is strictly better than
std::lock_guard as it supports locking any number of mutexes safely.
It's also easier to use than std::lock for locking multiple mutexes at
once.
Originally, PIDController used PIDSource with its "PIDSourceType" to
determine whether a class should return position or velocity to the
controller. However, the supported languages have changed a lot over 10
years and now support lambdas. Instead of using PIDSource and PIDOutput,
users can pass in doubles to the Calculate() function synchronously.
This makes the controller much more flexible for team's needs as they no
longer have to make a separate PIDSource-inheriting class just to
provide a custom input.
The built-in feedforward was removed. Since PIDController is synchronous
now, they can add their own feedforward on top of what Calculate()
returns.
To facilitate running the controller asynchronously, there is a
PIDControllerRunner class that handles that. By separating the loop from
the control law, PIDController can now be composed with others and be
used to control a drivetrain (a multiple input, multiple output system
that requires summing the results from two controllers) much easier.
Also, motion profiling can be used to set the reference over time.
All the classes related to the old PIDController are now deprecated. The
new classes are in an experimental namespace to avoid name conflicts.
While this is a large change, I think it is a necessary one for growth.
The old PIDController design was created in a time when languages only
supported OOP, and we have more tools at our disposal now to solve
problems. This more versatile implementation can be used in more places
like as a replacement for Pathfinder's "EncoderFollower" class.
There has been hesitation to add lambda support to WPILib for a while
now out of concerns for requiring teams to learn more features of C++ or
Java. In my opinion, this change makes PIDController easier to use, not
harder. The concept of a function is a building block of OOP and should
be learned before classes. The ability to store functions as first-class
objects and invoke them just like variables is rather natural.
Note that PID constants for the new controller will be different from
the old one. The original controller didn't take the discretization
period into account. To fix this, teams should just have to divide their
Ki gain by 0.05 and multiply their Kd gain by 0.05 where 0.05 is the
original default period.
