1. Make the OpMode interface itself periodic; this means the only
differences between `OpMode` and `PeriodicOpMode` are the latter's
methods to add sideloaded periodic callbacks
2. Make OpModeRobot process callbacks in a similar fashion to TimedRobot
and
3. Add some lifecycle functions (discussed below)
4. Pull the callback priority queue from TimedRobot to a new class
called `PeriodicPriorityQueue` so that `TimedRobot` and `OpModeRobot`
have less duplication
5. Fix a typo in the DriverStationJNI class that causes a memory leak
when certain driver station sim calls
6. Port the C++ OpModeRobot tests to Java
`OpModeRobot` now possesses some `IterativeRobotBase`-stye lifecycle
functions; these functions
1. `robotPeriodic`
2. `simulationInit` and `simulationPeriodic`
3. `disabledInit`, `disabledPeriodic`, and `disabledExit`
(note that `simulationInit` and `disabledInit` may be renamed to match
wpilibsuite#8719)
`OpModeRobot` also now processes `OpMode` changes (by the Driver
Station) in its `loopFunc` method, similar to
`IterativeRobotBase.loopFunc` processing game mode changes; `loopFunc`
is, similarly to `TimedRobot`, provided as a default `Callback`
---------
Signed-off-by: Zach Harel <zach@zharel.me>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Eng <91924258+KangarooKoala@users.noreply.github.com>
Commands are no longer able to outlive their schedule-site's scope,
regardless of how they were scheduled (set as a default command, bound
to a trigger, or manually scheduled)
As a consequence, default commands need better tracking so the default
command setting can be released when their scope exits and the next-most
appropriate default command can be rescheduled (eg, an opmode sets a
default command, then the globally-scoped default is restored when the
opmode exits). Some complexity is required here to make it work well for
edge cases.
Like `schedule()`, `setDefaultCommand()` will immediately start the new
default command if called inside of another command to avoid 1-loop
delays. However, this does not apply when called by the _current_
default command, as it would result in attempting to cancel the default
command while it's mounted (which is impossible and would throw an
exception)
```java
class Robot extends OpModeRobot {
final Drive drive = new Drive();
final CommandXboxController controller = new CommandXboxController(1);
public Robot() {
// global default command, active unless overridden in an opmode or command
drive.setDefaultCommand(drive.stop());
// global trigger binding, always active
controller.rightBumper().onTrue(drive.setX());
}
}
@Teleop
class ExampleOpMode extends PeriodicOpMode {
public ExampleOpMode(Robot robot) {
// opmode-specific default command
robot.drive.setDefaultCommand(robot.drive.operatorControl(robot.controller));
// opmode-specific binding
robot.controller.leftBumper().whileTrue(robot.drive.stop());
// opmode-specific binding that takes precedence over the global binding
// because it happens last; it "wins out" over the `setX()` binding
robot.controller.rightBumper().onTrue(robot.drive.selfTest());
}
@Override
public void periodic() {
Scheduler.getDefault().run();
}
}
```
- Remove status return from HAL level (clock getting should never fail)
- Remove 32-bit timestamp expand function
- Make monotonic_clock.hpp (formerly fpga_clock.hpp) header-only and
move to root hal include directory
Adding an ack parameter to both set and cancel is cleaner than adding
all the set alarm parameters to the ack function. It also provides an
ack-and-cancel method.
It was possible for the alarm to fire between the set alarm and ack,
resulting in a hang on next wait. It's not possible to ack before set
alarm due to a race in sim step timing, so the fix is to provide an
atomic ack and set alarm; the easiest way to implement this in the API
was to change ack to optionally also set the alarm again.
This changes the HAL notifier interface to:
- Use wpiutil signal objects. This means waiting is done through the
`WPI_WaitObject` API instead of a dedicated function and allows for
higher level code to simultaneously wait on notifiers and other events.
- Interval timers are supported at the HAL layer
- Handlers are now required to acknowledge notifications. This is
invisible to users unless they're directly using the HAL API.
- For interval timers, an overrun count is maintained to detect if the
handler didn't acknowledge
The underlying implementation still uses condition variables for the
actual waiting. In basic testing using this approach seemed to be lower
jitter than timerfd.
Currently, the simulation and systemcore implementations are nearly
identical except for a few additional sim hook bits. This could be
refactored, but keeping them separate may make sense to keep the
systemcore implementation easy to read and reason about, or if we ever
choose to use a different underlying timer implementation on systemcore.
The simulation side API is unchanged in form but does change in
function--waiting for notifiers now only waits for currently running (or
newly signaled) notifiers to acknowledge. To avoid a race condition in
sim stepTiming, users of the low level API must make any alarm updates
(especially for one-shot alarms) prior to acknowledging the previous
alarm.
The only current use of the interval timer feature is the `Notifier`
class. The `TimedRobot` implementation still uses a single notifier and
its own interval timing logic to ensure consistent callback order. Using
separate notifiers for each user-level interval would substantially
increase complexity. `Watchdog` also doesn't use the interval timer, as
it's looking for an amount of time since the last `set` call rather than
a recurring interval time.
To reduce flicker, the sim GUI uses a fade out when a timeout goes from
set to unset.
This fixes tsan for wpilib and commands, and also fixes some spurious
test failures.
