Using an atomic here means we are never going against a lock that is touchable from user code. That should make reading the DS data from the DS callback even safer.
The CAN Stream API allows defining an buffer to receive an
arbitrary set of CAN messages, based on an ID and a mask. Messages
are added to this queue separate of other CAN APIs. This means the
messages can be receive without impacting other APIs such as
vendor APIs.
This enables things like detection of what devices are on the
bus, or custom decoding, without using vendor APIs.
Co-authored-by: Thad House <thadhouse1@gmail.com>
Theres is now a built in HMB api, but you have to dlopen it to access it. Moved our existing infrastructure for this to its own class, added the new functions, then updated interrupts and LEDs to use it.
The current DS thread model has some pretty major issues. It makes it difficult to know if all data is from the same remote packet, and if the data changes while the robot loop is running. Additionally, the DS thread is used for a few other things (MotorSafety and State Tracking for EducationalRobot). This also makes sim difficult, as user code has to wait for the thread to know it has new data.
This change completely rethinks how threading works in the driver station model.
First, the DS HAL system receives a new data callback, either from Netcomm or DriverStationSim. Inside the context of this callback, all the low latency data is read and put into a cache. Doing some investigation on the robot side, this is perfectly safe to do, and also ensures a ds packet will not be parsed before we finish reading the current packet data.
After all data is read, the cache is swapped with a 2nd buffer. This buffer just stores the data, none of the HAL DS calls read from this buffer. An event is then fired, stating there is new data ready to go.
Robot code calls HAL_UpdateDSData(). This swaps the 2nd buffer with a 3rd buffer, which always contains the current data. This data will not be updated until HAL_UpdateDSData is called again. Which solves the state problem.
The high level driver station classes have. an updateData() call, which calls HAL_UpdateDSData, and then update button state variables, then data log and update the NT FMS data table (Java also caches across the JNI boundary here, but that could trivially be removed). An extra event provider is provided, allowing other threads to know when this call has been completed.
IterativeRobotBase calls DS.updateData() at the beginning of each loop, and only once per loop. This means all commands will always have the same state.
All of this means there is no longer a DS thread. Everything happens synchronously. This means Sim and testing is easier, as you can just call DriverStationSim.NotifyNewData(), and then DriverStation.UpdateData(), and you can guarantee that all the DriverStation.*** data is up to date.
As for Motor Safety and Educational Robot State Handling, those can all be handled by their own threads. The Educational Thread only needs to run under EducationalRobot, and MotorSafety will only be started if there is a motor safety object enabled.
* Use explicit this capture required by C++20
* Use C++20 span
* Replace wpi::numbers with std::numbers
* Fix C++20 clang-tidy warning false positive in fmt
* Remove ciso646 include since C++20 removed that header
* Fix global-buffer-overflow asan warnings in ntcore tests
* Add DIOSetProxy constructor to HAL
* Upgrade MSVC compiler to 2022
* Bump native-utils to 2023.2.7 (changes to std=c++20)
Co-authored-by: Peter Johnson <johnson.peter@gmail.com>
The existing raw time has an issue where it jumps around, as in the FPGA if the frequency is not a multiple or divisor of 25 Mhz it jumps around by 1 every second. While waiting on an FPGA change, update the API to make raw output give nanoseconds rather then a scaled value. This does a longer read cycle to get the correct value, but in the future if a fast FPGA function is added this can be easily changed.
Checkstyle naming conventions were changed to allow most of what's in
wpimath. Naming rules were disabled completely in wpimath since almost
all suppressions are for math notation.
SPI Mode setting was very broken. MSB and LSB sets did not work (MSB is the only one supported)
and if LSB was set (which was the default) the ioct to set clock phase would fail. This
deprecates all the individual functions, the LSB/MSB functions, and adds an SPI mode selection
function. This is usually more understandable, and shows up in a lot more documentation
Force the status to be 0 (no error) upon initialization of the REV PneumaticHub.
This prevents a program crash in the case of a robot code restart with no CAN Bus present.
The FPGA API takes microseconds directly, instead of a scaled value. Also add a new HAL level API to trigger multiple DIOs with the same pulse at once.
The warnings included recommendations of braces for if statement
readability, a recommendation for default initialization of an int
array, and include-what-you-use (indirectly through clang-tidy reporting
undefined symbols).
GCC's static analyzer is correctly reporting that resize() requires an
unsigned integer, but the argument provided in the JNI function could be
negative since it's a signed byte. Throwing an exception if the argument
is negative fixes the warning.
The previous documentation suggested that `triggerTime` is the interval until the next alarm, but the implementation is that it is the absolute alarm time.
The real robot has match time set to -1.0 until it's enabled, and then
counts down. Disabling the robot sets the time to -1.0.
The sim GUI has been updated to add preset buttons for auto and teleop
match times. The enable match timing checkbox has been removed as it's
no longer required.
The DS socket plugin has also been fixed to properly initialize
matchTime to -1.0 and reset it to -1.0 on disable.
Most of these were unused, the IMU ones were just debug messages.
The only one that wasn't removed is in portable-file-dialogs.cpp since
the replacement looks less trivial.
Adds HAL layer warning for #3842. This is needed in the case when a
vendor uses the HAL directly rather than using the WPILib I2C class.
This should not result in a duplicate warning for WPILib I2C users due
to the duplicate message checking performed in HAL_SendError().
We don't want to remove the WPILib I2C warning because it gives stack
trace information while the HAL layer one can't.
