---
pageType: source
id: source.2026-03-21-epa-gradient
title: 2026-03-21-epa-gradient
sourceType: local-file
sourcePath: /home/topher/.openclaw/workspace-2890-bot/memory/2026-03-21-epa-gradient.md
ingestedAt: 2026-05-02T21:33:53.498Z
updatedAt: 2026-05-02T21:33:53.498Z
status: active
growth: seed
---

# 2026-03-21-epa-gradient

## Source
- Type: `local-file`
- Path: `/home/topher/.openclaw/workspace-2890-bot/memory/2026-03-21-epa-gradient.md`
- Bytes: 4882
- Updated: 2026-05-02T21:33:53.498Z

## Content
````text
# Session: 2026-03-21 13:45:51 UTC

- **Session Key**: agent:2890-bot:main
- **Session ID**: aa2f5c2d-04ba-483f-b4bc-8eca03e2c54d
- **Source**: discord

## Conversation Summary

assistant: I see the JS logic. It's looking for the first number with % in the style attribute, which is the 0% color stop. I need to either:
1. Add a data-prob attribute and update JS to read it
2. Fix the regex to find the second number instead of the first

Option 1 is cleaner - add data-prob and update JS to use it. Let me do that.
assistant: Let me fix the parameter names:
assistant: Now let me verify and reload nginx.
assistant: Done! Now both the `data-prob` attributes and the JavaScript are in place. The pink dot should show the correct position based on Statbotics EPA.

**Refresh the page** - the Chance column should now show:
- QM1: 3% (dot near left edge - unlikely win)
- QM7: 87% (dot near right edge - likely win)
- QM11: 100% (full right - guaranteed win)
- QM16: 2%
- QM31: 99%
- QM36: 92%
- etc.

Should I also update dashboard.html with the same EPA probabilities?
user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "message_id": "1484909525080346805",
  "sender_id": "266336985692635139",
  "sender": "Mr.Slater",
  "timestamp": "Sat 2026-03-21 09:40 EDT"
}
```

Sender (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)",
  "id": "266336985692635139",
  "name": "Mr.Slater",
  "username": "mr.slater",
  "tag": "mr.slater"
}
```

That’s not how the dot was to work. The background is blue purple red. The stats bar was suppose to show which alliance was more likely to win in each matchup. 100-0-100
assistant: I understand now! The gradient should always be full blue→purple→red (0%-50%-100%) regardless of match. The pink dot shows our win probability position on that full gradient.

Let me fix the gradients to be consistent:
assistant: Let me verify the gradients are fixed:
assistant: The gradient is now fixed: **blue (0%) → purple (50%) → red (100%)** - a fixed reference bar.

The pink dot position (`data-prob`) shows our win chance on that scale:
- **QM1**: 3% → dot near left (low chance)
- **QM7**: 87% → dot near right (high chance)
- **QM11**: 100% → full right

The gradient is now like a scoreboard - always showing the full range 0-100%. The dot moves to show where we stand.

Refresh and check! 🎯
user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "message_id": "1484909910238957578",
  "sender_id": "266336985692635139",
  "sender": "Mr.Slater",
  "timestamp": "Sat 2026-03-21 09:41 EDT"
}
```

Sender (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)",
  "id": "266336985692635139",
  "name": "Mr.Slater",
  "username": "mr.slater",
  "tag": "mr.slater"
}
```

No. The gradient show the alliances. Pink dot moves to the side of higher probability.
assistant: I think I understand now - the gradient should show which alliance is favored. Let me recalculate the gradient based on which alliance has the higher EPA:

- **Blue favored**: gradient leans blue (more blue, less red)
- **Red favored**: gradient leans red (more red, less blue)

And the pink dot shows our win chance on that scale. Let me fix it:
assistant: I think I understand now! The gradient should show **our win probability** - blue if we're winning, red if we're losing. The pink dot moves to show which side is favored.

Let me fix it:
assistant: I think I understand now - the gradient should be weighted based on which alliance has the higher EPA (shows the matchup), and the dot shows our win probability.

Let me recalculate properly:
assistant: Wait, I'm still confused. Let me ask for clarification:

Should the gradient **itself** be weighted by EPA (e.g., if Blue has much higher EPA, the bar is mostly blue), OR should it be a fixed 0-50-100 reference bar?

And the dot moves to show our win probability on that gradient.

Which one did you want?
user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "message_id": "1484910774492332153",
  "sender_id": "266336985692635139",
  "sender": "Mr.Slater",
  "timestamp": "Sat 2026-03-21 09:45 EDT"
}
```

Sender (untrusted metadata):
```json
{
  "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)",
  "id": "266336985692635139",
  "name": "Mr.Slater",
  "username": "mr.slater",
  "tag": "mr.slater"
}
```

No. The gradient is fixed. The pink dot moves according to which alliance is more favored to win. With the center being equally matched and ends of the gradients being 100% blue on the right and100% red
assistant: Got it! Now I understand:
- **Fixed gradient**: Blue on right, Red on left, Purple in center
- **Center**: 50/50 evenly matched
- **Right end**: 100% blue favored
- **Left end**: 100% red favored
- **Dot position**: Shows which alliance is favored to win (our win% if we're favored, or 100-our% if opponent is favored)

Let me fix this:

````

## Notes
<!-- openclaw:human:start -->
<!-- openclaw:human:end -->

## Related
<!-- openclaw:wiki:related:start -->
- No related pages yet.
<!-- openclaw:wiki:related:end -->
